Yes — foreign firms can freeze a Chinese company’s assets before judgment through pre-judgment asset preservation (财产保全, cáichǎn bǎoquán), governed by PRC Civil Procedure Law Articles 100–105 and the 2016 Supreme People’s Court Provisions on Property Preservation. Courts typically process applications within 48 hours for emergency cases, and the preservation bond typically ranges from 10% to 30% of the claim value, with a minimum bond of RMB 500,000 for most commercial disputes involving foreign parties. This mechanism — analogous to a freezing injunction or Mareva injunction in common law jurisdictions — is one of the most powerful tools available to foreign companies pursuing claims in China. Understanding when you qualify, how much bond to post, and what assets can be frozen is essential before commencing litigation.
Direct Answer: Can You Freeze Assets Before Judgment in China?
Yes. PRC Civil Procedure Law (中华人民共和国民事诉讼法, Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó Mínshì Sùsòng Fǎ) Article 100 expressly authorizes courts to issue preservation orders before judgment where: (a) the opposing party’s conduct may render judgment unenforceable, or (b) the opposing party’s conduct may cause other harm to the applicant. Article 101 separately provides for pre-litigation preservation (诉前保全, sùqián bǎoquán) — filed before the lawsuit itself — but this requires faster court action (48 hours) and a higher bond of up to 100% of the claim amount.
For foreign firms with enforceable contractual claims, the standard route is preservation filed concurrently with or shortly after the complaint (诉中保全, sùzhōng bǎoquán). The court must rule within 5 days for in-litigation preservation. If the application is urgent and the opposing party may dissipate assets, the court issues the ruling within 48 hours. The preservation order remains in effect for the duration of the litigation, typically 12–24 months for first-instance trials.
Legal Basis: Civil Procedure Law and SPC Provisions
The asset preservation regime rests on several legal pillars under Chinese law. The core provisions are found in the Civil Procedure Law, the 2016 SPC Provisions on Property Preservation, and the SPC’s Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law (2022 revision).
| Legal Source | Citation | Key Provision |
|---|---|---|
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 100 | Court may issue preservation order where conduct may render judgment unenforceable or cause other harm |
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 101 | Pre-litigation preservation requires filing the lawsuit within 30 days; court must rule in 48 hours |
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 102 | Preservation scope limited to the claim amount or equivalent property value |
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 103 | Methods include freezing bank accounts, sealing property, or seizing assets |
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 104 | Court may require the applicant to provide a bond; releases if preservation is improper |
| PRC Civil Procedure Law | Article 105 | Applicant liable for damages caused by wrongful preservation |
| SPC Provisions on Property Preservation (2016) | Fa Shi [2016] No. 22 | Standardized rules on bond amounts, asset identification, and preservation execution |
The 2016 SPC Provisions (最高人民法院关于人民法院办理财产保全案件若干问题的规定) are particularly important for foreign firms — they standardize bond amounts across courts, clarify the court’s duty to assist in identifying assets, establish the acceptability of insurance guarantee letters, and set out penalties for malicious preservation applications. Before 2016, bond requirements varied widely between courts, making preservation unpredictable for foreign applicants.
Bond Requirements: What You Must Deposit
The preservation bond (保全担保, bǎoquán dāngbǎo) is a critical practical consideration. Foreign firms should budget for the following typical bond amounts based on their situation:
| Scenario | Bond Amount | Bond Type |
|---|---|---|
| In-litigation preservation (suing Chinese party) | 10%–30% of claim amount | Cash, bank guarantee, or insurance guarantee letter |
| Pre-litigation preservation (before filing) | 100% of claim amount | Cash or bank guarantee (insurance guarantee rarely accepted) |
| Foreign applicant without China presence | 30%–50% of claim amount | Bank guarantee from PRC-licensed bank strongly preferred |
| Foreign applicant with WFOE in China | 10%–20% of claim amount | Insurance guarantee letter from PRC insurer accepted |
Since 2016, Chinese courts widely accept insurance company guarantee letters (诉讼保全责任保险, sùsòng bǎoquán zérèn bǎoxiǎn) as bond instruments. These cost approximately 0.3%–1% of the claim amount annually and are significantly more cash-efficient than posting the full bond amount. Major Chinese insurers offering this product include PICC Property and Casualty, Ping An Insurance, and China Pacific Insurance. For a RMB 10 million claim, the annual cost of an insurance guarantee letter is approximately RMB 30,000–100,000, compared to the opportunity cost of tying up RMB 1–3 million in cash.
Application Process: Step by Step
Obtaining a pre-judgment asset preservation order in China follows this sequence:
- Engage PRC-licensed counsel — Foreign firms must retain a Chinese law firm to file the preservation application. Under PRC law, foreign law firms cannot appear in Chinese courts.
- Prepare the preservation application (财产保全申请书) — Include the claim amount, specific assets to be frozen, the legal basis, and evidence that the opposing party may dissipate assets.
- Identify the target assets — Provide account numbers, bank branch names, and property registration numbers. Chinese courts generally do not conduct asset discovery — the applicant bears the burden of identification.
- Secure the bond — Post cash, obtain a bank guarantee, or purchase an insurance guarantee letter. Submit the bond instrument with the preservation application.
- File the preservation application and lawsuit — For in-litigation preservation, file the complaint and preservation application simultaneously. The court assigns a case number and judge.
- Court ruling — Within 5 days (in-litigation) or 48 hours (pre-litigation/urgent), the court issues a civil ruling (民事裁定书). You may appeal a rejection within 5 days.
- Execution of preservation — The court’s enforcement division serves the preservation order on the bank, real estate bureau, or other asset custodian.
- Confirmation — The court issues a preservation completion notice listing the frozen assets and amounts.
The total timeline from counsel engagement to frozen assets is typically 1–3 weeks for a straightforward bank account freeze, and 3–6 weeks for freezing real estate or receivables across multiple provinces.
What Assets Can Be Frozen? Scope and Limitations
Chinese courts can freeze a broad range of assets. The following table summarizes the common asset types and practical considerations for enforcement:
| Asset Type | Freezable? | Practical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bank accounts (RMB) | Yes | Frozen at current balance; funds continue to accrue if accounts receive payments |
| Bank accounts (foreign currency) | Yes | Frozen in original currency; conversion at market rate for valuation |
| Real estate | Yes | Court seals the property registration; sale or mortgage blocked |
| Accounts receivable | Yes | Third-party debtors notified; valid only if receivable is undisputed |
| Equity/shares | Yes | Shares in Chinese companies frozen at SAIC registration; dividend payments intercepted |
| Intellectual property | Yes | Patent/trademark registration transfer blocked; licensing revenue can be attached |
| Inventory/goods | Conditional | Sealed on-site; requires court officer presence and storage arrangements |
| Vehicles | Yes | Vehicle registration blocked; physical seizure rare |
| Cryptocurrency | Limited | SPC recognizes digital assets as property; enforcement depends on exchange cooperation |
Article 102 of the Civil Procedure Law limits preservation to assets whose value does not substantially exceed the claim amount. Courts generally enforce this strictly — freezing assets worth more than 110%–130% of the claim may be deemed excessive.
Special Considerations for Foreign Firms
Foreign companies face several unique challenges when pursuing asset preservation in China:
- No automatic recognition of foreign freezing orders — A Mareva injunction from a Hong Kong, English, or US court has no direct effect in mainland China. You must file a fresh preservation application with the PRC court. Total time from foreign court order to PRC asset freeze is typically 3–8 weeks.
- Reciprocity for foreign bond instruments — Chinese courts may not accept a bond from a foreign insurance company. Budget for a PRC-licensed bank guarantee or purchase a Chinese insurance guarantee letter. Processing the guarantee takes 5–10 business days.
- Asset tracing challenges — Without a Chinese presence, foreign firms cannot easily trace the defendant’s Chinese bank accounts or property. Engage a Chinese investigation firm or use e-discovery of the defendant’s own records.
- Notarization and translation — The preservation application and supporting evidence may need notarization, apostille (under the Hague Convention effective November 7, 2023), and certified Chinese translation. Budget 2–4 weeks for document authentication.
- Cost of the application — Court filing fee for preservation is approximately 0.5% of the preserved amount (capped at RMB 5,000). Bond costs range from 0.3%–1% of the claim amount for insurance guarantees, plus counsel fees typically ranging from RMB 50,000–200,000.
Risks and Penalties: Wrongful Preservation
Applicants bear significant liability for improper preservation. Under Civil Procedure Law Article 105, if the preservation order is later found to be wrong — because the lawsuit is dismissed, the claim is rejected, or the preservation amount was excessive — the applicant must compensate the opposing party for losses caused by the freezing. These losses can include interest on frozen funds at the PRC benchmark loan rate (currently 3.1%–3.45% per annum), lost business opportunities if the freeze prevented a transaction, reputational harm, and litigation costs for lifting the preservation order. In practice, however, Chinese courts rarely award damages for wrongful preservation unless the applicant acted in bad faith or filed an entirely baseless claim.
Duration and Renewal of Preservation Orders
Preservation orders in China have defined validity periods that vary by asset type. Renewal requires a new application to the court before expiry:
| Asset Type | Initial Freeze Period | Renewable? | Max Total Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank accounts | 1 year | Yes | 2 years (subject to bond renewal) |
| Real estate | 3 years | Yes | 6 years |
| Equity/shares | 2 years | Yes | 4 years |
| Other property | 2 years | Yes | 4 years |
A renewal application must be filed at least 7 days before the current freeze expires. Failure to apply results in automatic lifting of the freeze — the opposing party can withdraw funds instantly.
Practical Strategy: When and How to Freeze
Based on experience with Chinese commercial courts, foreign firms should consider the following strategic guidance when pursuing asset preservation:
- Act before the dispute escalates — Once the opposing party learns of impending litigation, asset dissipation accelerates. File the preservation application simultaneously with or before filing the complaint.
- Target bank accounts first — Bank account freezes are the fastest and most enforceable preservation method. If you have bank details from past payment records, freeze those accounts immediately.
- Consider multiple jurisdictions — If the Chinese company has assets in multiple provinces, file preservation applications in each relevant Intermediate People’s Court. Cross-province coordination is improving but still inconsistent.
- Use the insurance guarantee letter — At 0.3%–1% of the preserved amount per year, the insurance guarantee letter is the most cost-efficient bond instrument available for foreign firms.
- Monitor the freeze period — Set calendar reminders for 10 months (bank accounts) or 2 years and 10 months (real estate) to apply for renewal well before expiry.
Where to Go From Here
Pre-judgment asset preservation is a powerful but procedurally demanding tool for foreign firms in China. The key to success is preparation: trace the assets before filing, secure a Chinese insurance guarantee letter, and engage experienced PRC litigation counsel.
- [guide: SLUG-TO-BE-FILLED] — A practical guide to enforcing judgments and orders in China
- [comparison: SLUG-TO-BE-FILLED] — Compare freezing orders across China, Hong Kong, and Singapore
- [tool: SLUG-TO-BE-FILLED] — Calculate preservation bond costs and court fees
Can I freeze a Chinese company’s assets before judgment? — first published on China Gateway 360. Last updated: July 2026.
